The Recidivism Of Offenders Given Suspended Sentences

< BACK TO CRIME starstarstarstarstar   Government - Crime Press Release
11th November 2009, 01:29pm - Views: 811





The recidivism of offenders given suspended sentences:

A comparison with full-time imprisonment 


Being sent to prison is no more effective in reducing the risk of future re-offending than

being threatened with prison, the NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research has found. In

fact, if anything, being sent to prison actually increases the risk of further offending. 


The Bureau compared a group of offenders given a suspended sentence of imprisonment with

a group of offenders given a sentence of full-time imprisonment. 


The prison and suspended sentence cases were carefully matched on a large range of factors

including gender, Indigenous status, age, socioeconomic disadvantage, jurisdiction (Local or

District), plea, offence type, offence seriousness, number of concurrent offences, number of

prior offences, whether the defendant had had a previous suspended sentence, whether the

defendant had a prior juvenile offence and whether the offender had a prior violent offence. 


Separate analyses were carried out

for 1,661 matched pairs of offenders with a prior prison

sentence and 2,650 matched pairs of offenders who had no prior prison sentence.


Re-offending was measured via the proportion of offenders convicted of a further offence in

each group. Offenders were followed up from the date of sentence (between 2002 to 2004)

until their first reconviction or the end of 2008 (whichever came first). 


In cases where the offender had no previous experience of imprisonment, the Bureau found

no significant difference in the likelihood of re-conviction between those who received a full-

time sentence of imprisonment and those who were given a suspended sentence of

imprisonment. 


In cases where the offender had been previously sent to prison, the Bureau found offenders

sent to prison were significantly more likely to re-offend than matched offenders given a

suspended sentence of imprisonment. 


Commenting on the findings, the Director of the Bureau, Dr Don Weatherburn, said they

were consistent with a growing body of evidence that the experience of imprisonment does

not reduce the risk of further offending. 


“This does not mean we should abandon prison as a sanction for offending,” he said. “Prison

might still be justified on the grounds of general deterrence, punishment or

incapacitation.

Our study suggests, however, that it would be wrong to impose a prison sentence on an

offender in the belief that it will deter the offender from further offending.”


Further enquiries: Dr Don Weatherburn 0419-494-408 or 9231-9190







news articles logo NEWS ARTICLES
Contact News Articles |Remove this article