Doctors Call For Inquiry Into Australia's War On Iraq

< BACK TO GOVERNMENTS starstarstarstarstar   Government - Governments Press Release
4th February 2010, 01:12pm - Views: 697






People Feature Medical Association For Prevention Of War 2 image


MEDICAL ASSOCIATION FOR PREVENTION OF WAR (AUSTRALIA)

www.mapw.org.au   mapw@mapw.org.au


MEDIA RELEASE


Doctors call for inquiry into 

Australia's war on Iraq


The Medical Association for Prevention of War supports calls for an independent inquiry into

Australia’s involvement in the Iraq War.

MAPW President, Dr Bill Williams, agreed, saying: 'It's time to quiz the men and women

who sent Australians to war in Iraq: let us scrutinise their reasons: Were they valid? Was our

intelligence accurate? Was our participation legal? Can we protect our national interests more

effectively?"

"If the Dutch, the British and the American public can scrutinise their leaders’ path to war,

why can't we? We owe it to our soldiers and their families - and ourselves." 

A recent Age editorial and a major piece in the Canberra Times have argued for an Australian

inquiry, in discussing the UK’s Chilcot inquiry which aims to obtain “a reliable account of the

UK’s involvement”, and lessons for the future. 

"The invasion of Iraq was opposed by the parliamentary Opposition and by the majority of

ordinary Australians. As predicted by our organisation and many others, it was a humanitarian

disaster with many negative long-term regional and international legacies. A formal

commission of inquiry could help us avoid unnecessary, destructive and counter-productive

military engagements in the future" said Dr Williams.

An inquiry could inform Australia of the following: 


How and on what basis, the decision to join the invasion was made


How could this decision have been averted?


Has Australia’s participation broken Australian or international law, or breached our

treaty obligations?


Are individuals, including the former Prime Minister, legally culpable?  


How can such decisions be prevented, and democracy and transparency guaranteed,

for the future?


What have been the implications of our participation? 

Testimony to the Chilcot inquiry indicates that democratic processes were distorted and

citizens and Parliament misinformed by UK leaders in their determination to participate in the

invasion and occupation. 

Calls for an inquiry coincide with a Bill before Australia’s Parliament, which would require

the consent of Parliament before troops are committed to a war. This is a constitutional

requirement in many countries. 

4 February 2010


Dr Bill Williams [m] 0428 616245, [w] 03 52 603 911

or via Nancy Atkin, MAPW, 8344 1637 or 0431 475 465


MAPW is the Australian affiliate of the Nobel Prize (1985) winning International Physicians

for the Prevention of Nuclear War.






news articles logo NEWS ARTICLES
Contact News Articles |Remove this article